![]() However, potentially Gimp should be able to knock Photoshop of it's throne. Gimp has always been the alternative that could never push Photoshop from it's throne, despite being free of charge. Photoshop has been the number One in photo editing for decades. Until someone can provide relevant links to the current developers and the source code, this article should continue to mark GIMPshop as on hold or abandoned. harvests emails and monetizes its downloads, but in exchange it doesn't offer the code for inspection. Where is the repository for this software? Who leads development and maintenance on this version? How do you submit bug-fixes? Are these 'developers' simply wrapping GIMP for Windows inside an ad-ware bundle in order to profit off of the GIMPshop name and the GIMP project? Unless there is proof that GIMPshop 2.8+ is actually an existing fork with a dev team, this article should not link to it with the implication that this is a vetted version. Please push the 'Back' button and notify the website owner.' Essentially, you can't actually get the source code for this 'new version' in order to examine whether or not it's actually GIMPshop and not just a rebundled GIMP for Windows.įurthermore, there is no way to identify or contact the current developers allegedly handling this project. If you do plug in an email address you simply get an error message stating, 'Mailing List Not Active-This mailing list is not currently active. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |